<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is 64-bit DB2 Express-C better than 32-bit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freedb2.com/2008/06/05/is-64-bit-db2-express-c-better-than-32-bit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freedb2.com/2008/06/05/is-64-bit-db2-express-c-better-than-32-bit/</link>
	<description>Big Data, Hadoop, free databases and a whole lot of Cloud Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://freedb2.com/2008/06/05/is-64-bit-db2-express-c-better-than-32-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-8005</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedb2.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-8005</guid>
		<description>The was a very important part of the sentence before the one you quoted: &quot;... if you are running 32-bit OS on a system with 4GB of memory,&quot;. The way both Linux 32-bit and Windows 32-bit allocate memory pretty much dictates that memory left for applications is going to be no more than 2.4-3.8GB. This has nothing to do with DB2 and everything to do with the operating system. That is why people look to 64-bit OS. What I was trying to say is that even if you only have 4GB of physical memory it still makes sense to run 64-bit OS and if you are going to run 64-bit OS you may as well run 64-bit DB2 Express-C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The was a very important part of the sentence before the one you quoted: &#8220;&#8230; if you are running 32-bit OS on a system with 4GB of memory,&#8221;. The way both Linux 32-bit and Windows 32-bit allocate memory pretty much dictates that memory left for applications is going to be no more than 2.4-3.8GB. This has nothing to do with DB2 and everything to do with the operating system. That is why people look to 64-bit OS. What I was trying to say is that even if you only have 4GB of physical memory it still makes sense to run 64-bit OS and if you are going to run 64-bit OS you may as well run 64-bit DB2 Express-C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun Srini</title>
		<link>http://freedb2.com/2008/06/05/is-64-bit-db2-express-c-better-than-32-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-7983</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun Srini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedb2.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-7983</guid>
		<description>&quot; DB2 effectively will be limited to about 2.4 – 3.8GB depending on the OS and the way it is configured&quot;

But why??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; DB2 effectively will be limited to about 2.4 – 3.8GB depending on the OS and the way it is configured&#8221;</p>
<p>But why??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparing Free databases: Oracle XE vs DB2 Express-C &#124; FreeDB2.com</title>
		<link>http://freedb2.com/2008/06/05/is-64-bit-db2-express-c-better-than-32-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparing Free databases: Oracle XE vs DB2 Express-C &#124; FreeDB2.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedb2.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>[...] the 64-bit version of DB2 Express-C in a 2GB or even 4GB environment. If you are wondering, read my blog post on the subject. So, DB2 Express-C can take advantage of 2-4 times the hardware resource when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the 64-bit version of DB2 Express-C in a 2GB or even 4GB environment. If you are wondering, read my blog post on the subject. So, DB2 Express-C can take advantage of 2-4 times the hardware resource when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

